Russia shows ‘reckless disregard’ for Ukraine civilians, U.S. spy chiefs say By Reuters


2/2
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines testifies during a Senate Armed Services hearing to examine worldwide threats on Capitol Hill, Washington, U.S., April 29, 2021. Graeme Jennings/Pool via REUTERS

2/2

By Patricia Zengerle and Jonathan Landay

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Russian forces are operating with “reckless disregard” for civilians as they face stronger-than-expected resistance in Ukraine, and American intelligence agencies are tracking their actions to hold them to account, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines said on Thursday.

“The Russian military has begun to loosen its rules of engagement to achieve their military objectives,” Haines told the Senate Intelligence Committee’s annual hearing on worldwide threats to U.S. security.

Haines, a Cabinet-level official who heads the U.S. intelligence agencies, said intelligence officers were documenting Russia’s actions in order to hold to account both the government in Moscow and individuals responsible for assaults on civilians.

“Russian forces are, at the very least, operating with reckless disregard for the safety of civilians as Russian units launch artillery and airstrikes into urban areas – as they have done in cities across Ukraine,” said Haines, the main intelligence adviser to President Joe Biden.

U.S. officials, including Vice President Kamala Harris, have offered support to calls for an international war crimes investigation into Russia’s invasion.

They cite examples including the bombing of a maternity hospital in the southern city of Mariupol. Russia shifted its stance over the hospital bombing, with a mix of statements on Thursday that veered between aggressive denials and a call by the Kremlin to establish clear facts.

Lieutenant General Scott Berrier, director of the U.S. military’s Defense Intelligence Agency, said Russia was using missiles, artillery, multiple rocket launchers and some precision-guided weapons in strikes on Ukrainian hospitals and apartment blocks.

Russia has denied targeting civilians. It calls its actions in Ukraine a “special operation” that it says is not designed to occupy territory but to destroy its southern neighbor’s military capabilities and capture what it regards as dangerous nationalists. Ukraine and its allies say that is a baseless pretext to invade a country of 44 million people.

UKRAINIAN RESISTANCE

Three weeks into the conflict, Haines and the other intelligence leaders said Russia was surprised by the strength of Ukrainian resistance. Haines said the resistance deprived Russia of a quick victory it thought would have prevented the United States and NATO from providing meaningful military aid.

Republican senators asked repeated questions about the rejection by Democrat Biden’s administration of accept Poland’s offer of its Russian-made MiG fighter jets for eventual transfer to Ukraine.

Berrier said providing combat aircraft would move the United States further up “the escalation ladder” than sending equipment like anti-tank and air defense systems.

The intelligence chiefs also said they thought China, which has refused to condemn Russia or call the attack an invasion, was “unsettled” by events in Ukraine.

“I do believe that the Chinese leadership, President Xi (Jinping) in particular, is unsettled,” Central Intelligence Agency Director William Burns said. “By what he’s seen, partly because his own intelligence doesn’t appear to have told him what was going to happen.”

The hearing featured unusually blunt admissions that initial U.S. assessments about Ukraine’s ability were off.

While U.S. spy agencies assessed before the invasion that Russian President Vladimir Putin was under-estimating the Ukrainians’ “likely resistance,” they did not do as well predicting the military challenges that Russia would face, Haines said.

Berrier said he initially believed the Ukrainians “were not as ready as I thought they should be. Therefore, I questioned their will to fight. That was a bad assessment on my part because they have fought bravely and honorably.”



Source link

2/2
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines testifies during a Senate Armed Services hearing to examine worldwide threats on Capitol Hill, Washington, U.S., April 29, 2021. Graeme Jennings/Pool via REUTERS

2/2

By Patricia Zengerle and Jonathan Landay

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Russian forces are operating with “reckless disregard” for civilians as they face stronger-than-expected resistance in Ukraine, and American intelligence agencies are tracking their actions to hold them to account, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines said on Thursday.

“The Russian military has begun to loosen its rules of engagement to achieve their military objectives,” Haines told the Senate Intelligence Committee’s annual hearing on worldwide threats to U.S. security.

Haines, a Cabinet-level official who heads the U.S. intelligence agencies, said intelligence officers were documenting Russia’s actions in order to hold to account both the government in Moscow and individuals responsible for assaults on civilians.

“Russian forces are, at the very least, operating with reckless disregard for the safety of civilians as Russian units launch artillery and airstrikes into urban areas – as they have done in cities across Ukraine,” said Haines, the main intelligence adviser to President Joe Biden.

U.S. officials, including Vice President Kamala Harris, have offered support to calls for an international war crimes investigation into Russia’s invasion.

They cite examples including the bombing of a maternity hospital in the southern city of Mariupol. Russia shifted its stance over the hospital bombing, with a mix of statements on Thursday that veered between aggressive denials and a call by the Kremlin to establish clear facts.

Lieutenant General Scott Berrier, director of the U.S. military’s Defense Intelligence Agency, said Russia was using missiles, artillery, multiple rocket launchers and some precision-guided weapons in strikes on Ukrainian hospitals and apartment blocks.

Russia has denied targeting civilians. It calls its actions in Ukraine a “special operation” that it says is not designed to occupy territory but to destroy its southern neighbor’s military capabilities and capture what it regards as dangerous nationalists. Ukraine and its allies say that is a baseless pretext to invade a country of 44 million people.

UKRAINIAN RESISTANCE

Three weeks into the conflict, Haines and the other intelligence leaders said Russia was surprised by the strength of Ukrainian resistance. Haines said the resistance deprived Russia of a quick victory it thought would have prevented the United States and NATO from providing meaningful military aid.

Republican senators asked repeated questions about the rejection by Democrat Biden’s administration of accept Poland’s offer of its Russian-made MiG fighter jets for eventual transfer to Ukraine.

Berrier said providing combat aircraft would move the United States further up “the escalation ladder” than sending equipment like anti-tank and air defense systems.

The intelligence chiefs also said they thought China, which has refused to condemn Russia or call the attack an invasion, was “unsettled” by events in Ukraine.

“I do believe that the Chinese leadership, President Xi (Jinping) in particular, is unsettled,” Central Intelligence Agency Director William Burns said. “By what he’s seen, partly because his own intelligence doesn’t appear to have told him what was going to happen.”

The hearing featured unusually blunt admissions that initial U.S. assessments about Ukraine’s ability were off.

While U.S. spy agencies assessed before the invasion that Russian President Vladimir Putin was under-estimating the Ukrainians’ “likely resistance,” they did not do as well predicting the military challenges that Russia would face, Haines said.

Berrier said he initially believed the Ukrainians “were not as ready as I thought they should be. Therefore, I questioned their will to fight. That was a bad assessment on my part because they have fought bravely and honorably.”

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *