The Vacuum Effect of the US Dollar

Commentary

April 2022 will go down in history as a milestone that has only been seen on three previous occasions since 1973; it’s a month in which the S&P500 Index and U.S. Treasuries have fallen at the same time, 5 percent and 2 percent, respectively. Additionally, the U.S. dollar has appreciated against the main currencies with which it trades and reached a new year high.

Years of monetary laughing gas have not diminished the strength of the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency, rather the opposite. Now we witness the vacuum effect: inflows into the U.S. dollar in a period of risk aversion.

The PBOC, the central bank of China, has had to give in and allow an aggressive devaluation of the yuan, although it tried to keep the currency stable via capital controls and a daily fixing. The government-programmed weakness of the yuan is probably designed to provide a boost to the Chinese economy in a slowdown and dissolve part of the yuan-denominated debt. However, it reduces the Chinese yuan’s appeal as an alternative to the U.S. dollar as global investors may fear both the central bank fixing as well as the tight capital controls imposed in China.

It isn’t surprising, for example, that many commodity-exporting countries’ currencies have weakened against the U.S. dollar despite rising exports and foreign exchange inflows. From the Norwegian krone to the currencies of major exporters, only the Brazilian real appears to be holding strong—and that’s because it’s had several atrocious years, so it’s more a bounce than an appreciation.

What we’re experiencing is the “vacuum effect,” which we have commented on before.

In periods of complacency, the world’s central banks play at being the Federal Reserve without having the world’s reserve currency or the legal security and financial balance of the United States. Many massively increase money supply without paying attention to the global and local demand for their currency, and in addition, governments issue more U.S. dollar-denominated debt, hoping that low rates will make the financing of huge deficits affordable. All this, in turn, leads the global demand for U.S. dollars to increase, not because the Federal Reserve carries out a restrictive policy, but because the comparison with others shows the alternative fiat currencies are much worse.

It’s very worrying that the European Central Bank is allowing the euro to get dangerously close to parity with the U.S. dollar because of its obsession with staying far away from the normalization process of other central banks. The global demand for euros is falling, and the trade surplus that supported the European currency is diminishing. All those who defend a weak euro should look at reality. Empirical evidence shows that the eurozone doesn’t export more due to a weak euro, but with products of higher added value. With a weak euro, imports skyrocket and become more expensive.

Thus, the U.S. dollar has created the conditions to be the most demanded currency simply because other central banks have been much more reckless. It only took an inflationary process that the central banks themselves denied or called transitory to raise the alarm of a market with overly optimistic expectations.

The market is clearly in a period of weakness and risk aversion. The effect of the invasion of Ukraine is relevant, but clearly the greatest impact is monetary. A market that rose to record highs on the back of aggressive money printing now finds itself in a tough spot as rate hikes and the end of asset purchases by central banks loom.

The fact is that this fear of interest rate hikes has led, so far, to a single modest rise of just 0.25 percent in the United States and none in Europe.

The North American economy has contracted 1.4 percent in the first quarter and has led analysts to revise downwards their estimates for 2022. At the same time, the European Union has shown that its main economies are close to stagnation or recession, with very poor progress in the first trimester. China, additionally, has put under the umbrella of COVID-19 what is a structural slowdown due to the burst of the real estate bubble and the political intervention in the leading sectors. This severe slowdown calls into question the central banks’ commitment to raising rates, especially doing so the number of times estimated by the consensus. Central banks will have to choose between high inflation or a significant increase in the cost of borrowing from states that refuse to reduce their imbalances.

Many expected a collapse of the U.S. dollar and a flight to other currencies for commodity trading. The reality has proven again that, in a “fire,” the U.S. dollar is the house with most windows and doors. The reckless policies of other central banks make the alternative in fiat world impossible. Will cryptocurrencies take over? Maybe, but it’s very far away.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Follow

Daniel Lacalle, Ph.D., is chief economist at hedge fund Tressis and author of “Freedom or Equality,” “Escape from the Central Bank Trap,” and “Life in the Financial Markets.”