Analyst Benjamin Cowen Highlights Ethereum’s Poor Performance By U.Today

[ad_1]


© Reuters. Analyst Benjamin Cowen Highlights Ethereum’s Poor Performance

U.Today – Analyst Benjamin Cowen shed light on (ETH) performance, which, contrary to popular belief, has not been as robust as many in the community think it is.

Cowen presented compelling data: on May 12, 2023, (BTC) and ETH were priced at $26,800 and $1,804, respectively. Fast forward to October 11, 2023, and BTC’s price steadfastly held at $26,800, whereas ETH had dwindled to $1,564. This downtrend was not just a momentary lapse but was reflected starkly in the ratio, which progressively slipped from 0.067 to 0.058 in the same period.

A counterpoint was raised by a crypto enthusiast who emphasized ETH’s 77% surge from its low, outpacing BTC’s 73% climb. However, Cowen swiftly noted the selective nature of these statistics. He stressed that a holistic view paints a different picture — from their all-time highs, had retracted by 61%, while ETH saw a sharper decline of 68%.

Current market analysis further cements Cowen’s stance. As of now, Bitcoin is trading at approximately $26,727.99, maintaining a semblance of stability. In contrast, struggles at around $1,551.34, a concerning figure for investors who recall its past highs.

This discourse is not just about numbers; it is a lesson in market perception versus reality. Ethereum, despite its groundbreaking contributions to the DeFi and NFT sectors, has not been impervious to market strains. Its trajectory, when juxtaposed with Bitcoin’s, highlights the nuances of market movements and the fallacy of general assumptions.

Momentary spikes and troughs can be deceptive, and an asset’s true health is often revealed in longer-term trends and broader market contexts. This revelation does not undermine Ethereum’s potential but serves as a grounding notice to traders to delve deeper, looking beyond the surface-level chatter to make informed investment decisions.

This article was originally published on U.Today

[ad_2]

Source link


© Reuters. Analyst Benjamin Cowen Highlights Ethereum’s Poor Performance

U.Today – Analyst Benjamin Cowen shed light on (ETH) performance, which, contrary to popular belief, has not been as robust as many in the community think it is.

Cowen presented compelling data: on May 12, 2023, (BTC) and ETH were priced at $26,800 and $1,804, respectively. Fast forward to October 11, 2023, and BTC’s price steadfastly held at $26,800, whereas ETH had dwindled to $1,564. This downtrend was not just a momentary lapse but was reflected starkly in the ratio, which progressively slipped from 0.067 to 0.058 in the same period.

A counterpoint was raised by a crypto enthusiast who emphasized ETH’s 77% surge from its low, outpacing BTC’s 73% climb. However, Cowen swiftly noted the selective nature of these statistics. He stressed that a holistic view paints a different picture — from their all-time highs, had retracted by 61%, while ETH saw a sharper decline of 68%.

Current market analysis further cements Cowen’s stance. As of now, Bitcoin is trading at approximately $26,727.99, maintaining a semblance of stability. In contrast, struggles at around $1,551.34, a concerning figure for investors who recall its past highs.

This discourse is not just about numbers; it is a lesson in market perception versus reality. Ethereum, despite its groundbreaking contributions to the DeFi and NFT sectors, has not been impervious to market strains. Its trajectory, when juxtaposed with Bitcoin’s, highlights the nuances of market movements and the fallacy of general assumptions.

Momentary spikes and troughs can be deceptive, and an asset’s true health is often revealed in longer-term trends and broader market contexts. This revelation does not undermine Ethereum’s potential but serves as a grounding notice to traders to delve deeper, looking beyond the surface-level chatter to make informed investment decisions.

This article was originally published on U.Today

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *